New Delhi reiterated that the non-automatic licencing necessities for tyres are administered in accordance with the foundations of the World Trade Organization’s settlement on import licencing procedures and that the process is honest.








World Trade Organization





India’s resolution to limit inbound shipments of sure forms of tyres and ban the import of air conditioners containing refrigerants has sparked outrage on the World Trade Organization (WTO), with numerous nations labelling the measures restrictive and discriminatory.












Almost two years after India imposed these restrictions, the EU said that solely a restricted variety of licences have been granted to the EU’s tyre producers. Taiwan stated at a WTO assembly this week that the measure is “restrictive and discriminatory.” At the identical assembly, Japan criticised India’s 2020 resolution to ban the import of air conditioners with refrigerants, calling it “superfluous.”

Taiwan stated the practically two-year-old tariffs had a detrimental affect on its exports to India, leading to a “significant decrease in exports in 2020 and 2021 compared to the same period in 2019.”

It additionally said that India seems to situation import licences just for tyres that aren’t manufactured in India, and it questioned how such a measure can be suitable with WTO guidelines governing quantitative restrictions. “Taiwan urged India to ensure that applications are properly granted, particularly non-automatic licences and that they are not trading restrictive or distortive,” stated a Geneva-based official acquainted with the assembly’s particulars.












According to the official, the EU, Indonesia, the United States, and Thailand have all expressed concern about New Delhi’s transfer.

“Only a limited number of licences have been granted to EU tyre manufacturers, and these licences are themselves limited in duration, quantities, and tyre types,” the official defined. According to Indonesia, the coverage is incompatible with the ideas of non-discrimination and nationwide therapy.

New Delhi reiterated that the non-automatic licencing necessities for tyres are administered in accordance with the foundations of the World Trade Organization’s settlement on import licencing procedures and that the process is honest.












Concerning the import ban on ACs, Japan claimed that it “unreasonably imposes a disruptive element in global supply chains,” whereas India claimed that the measure is in accordance with its Montreal Protocol obligations. “However, Japan stated that this import ban is unnecessary and that these air conditioners are not subject to India’s reduction and initial obligation under the Montreal Protocol, nor its domestic regulations,” the official stated.







LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here